Does this trouble anyone else but me?
From the NY Law Journal, 6/24/02:
"The government is under no obligation to disclose whether court-ordered monitoring of attorney-client conversations is ongoing in the aiding terrorism case against defense lawyer Lynne Stewart, prosecutors argued in court papers.
"Rejecting claims by Stewart and two co-defendants that the specter of government wiretaps makes an effective defense impossible, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Joseph F. Bianco and Christopher J. Morvillo said that "no statutory or case authority" supports the defendants' claim that they should be notified if their conversations are being monitored."
Read the full article here.
From the NY Law Journal, 6/24/02:
"The government is under no obligation to disclose whether court-ordered monitoring of attorney-client conversations is ongoing in the aiding terrorism case against defense lawyer Lynne Stewart, prosecutors argued in court papers.
"Rejecting claims by Stewart and two co-defendants that the specter of government wiretaps makes an effective defense impossible, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Joseph F. Bianco and Christopher J. Morvillo said that "no statutory or case authority" supports the defendants' claim that they should be notified if their conversations are being monitored."
Read the full article here.
posted by Daniel at 11:48 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home